Register now to be kept updated about key dates to act!

Stop Lime Down
Stop Lime Down
  • Home
  • Proposal
  • SLD Campaign
  • How you can help
  • Updates
  • Gallery
  • Art Exhibition
  • Calendar
  • Register for updates
  • More
    • Home
    • Proposal
    • SLD Campaign
    • How you can help
    • Updates
    • Gallery
    • Art Exhibition
    • Calendar
    • Register for updates

  • Home
  • Proposal
  • SLD Campaign
  • How you can help
  • Updates
  • Gallery
  • Art Exhibition
  • Calendar
  • Register for updates

Can you join our 1,000 club to help us to fund the experts to challenge Lime Down Solar proposals?

Can you join our 1,000 club to help us to fund the experts to challenge Lime Down Solar proposals?

Can you join our 1,000 club to help us to fund the experts to challenge Lime Down Solar proposals?

Can you join our 1,000 club to help us to fund the experts to challenge Lime Down Solar proposals?

Can you join our 1,000 club to help us to fund the experts to challenge Lime Down Solar proposals?

Can you join our 1,000 club to help us to fund the experts to challenge Lime Down Solar proposals?

Why we want to Stop Lime Down

Solar energy plays a crucial role in reducing the global carbon footprint and should be a key part of the UK’s energy mix. However, its development must be responsible. Large-scale solar farms should not be built on Best and Most Versatile (BMV) land or productive farmland. Instead, they should be prioritized on industrial sheds, brownfield sites, and rooftops—locations that can provide renewable energy without compromising the environment, food security, or local communities.


The ‘Stop Lime Down’ campaign supports renewable energy but opposes utility-scale solar farms on greenfield sites and agricultural land. Such developments threaten rural communities by taking valuable arable land, disrupting landscapes, and causing significant environmental and ecological damage. Additionally, the associated traffic and construction work add to the burden on these areas.

This is not an issue of opposing renewable energy; it’s about protecting our land, environment, and future from corporate profit motives that put our rural areas at risk.



Reasons to Object

Size and location of the development

Size and location of the development

Size and location of the development

The very large size of the proposed development is totally inappropriate. It will be one of the largest in the nation. The visual impact of such a huge industrial solar farm would fundamentally change the tranquil character of the area. We consider solar farms should be appropriately located on already industrialised land, on roof tops or adjacent to motorways, not on productive agricultural land.  

No Benefit to Local Community

Size and location of the development

Size and location of the development

There is no local energy benefit. The electricity produced will feed directly into the National Grid: the beneficiaries could be in Nottingham or Grimsby, not Norton or Grittleton.


The area will undergo disruption, noise, and traffic during construction, and a permanent loss of countryside and heritage once completed. It is already shown to have reduced house values in the area. 



Negative Effect on Tourism

Size and location of the development

Flood risks and groundwater contamination

Tourism is a vital part of the local economy, supporting countless businesses, jobs, and livelihoods. The first sight many visitors will encounter when entering the area from the south will be an ocean of solar panels, stretching across miles of countryside visible from the Cotswold AONB. This industrialisation threatens to undermine the region’s reputation as a place of natural beauty, harming local businesses and the wider economy.

Flood risks and groundwater contamination

Flood risks and groundwater contamination

The loss of permeable farmland will increase flood risks to nearby villages, while chemicals and leaks from infrastructure threaten to contaminate drinking water supplies.

BESS fire hazards

The Battery Energy Storage System introduces the danger of toxic gas emissions and fires, which are notoriously difficult to extinguish.
Such incidents have already caused multiday evacuations elsewhere.

Construction Chaos

The construction stage will last up to two years and will bring more than 20,000 articulated lorries, HGVs and vans transporting materials to site creating noise and pollution, and endangering pedestrians, cyclists and horse riders.  Additionally, a 25+ mile trench stretching from Sherston to Melksham will be incredibly disruptive for all around. 

Access Routes

Negative Visual Impact

Who pays for the cleanup?

Negative Visual Impact

The Cotswolds is one of the UK’s most treasured landscapes, drawing visitors from around the world. Towering panels, industrial structures, and fencing will destroy unspoiled countryside views, replacing them with an industrial wasteland.

Food Security

Who pays for the cleanup?

Negative Visual Impact

The UK currently relies on imports for approximately 46% of its food, making us the world’s third-largest importer of food. Arable land in the UK is declining. The farmland planned for development is 30% Best quality farm land (BMV).  Losing such land will worsen our reliance on imports at a time when resilience is critical.

Who pays for the cleanup?

Who pays for the cleanup?

Who pays for the cleanup?

This development poses significant risks to our community for two generations, over a period of 60 years, until 2090.

Currently, there is no enforceable mechanism to ensure the developers remove the solar panels and infrastructure at the end of the project’s life. This raises serious concerns about who will bear the cost of decommissioning and restoring the land –potentially leaving the burden on local communities or taxpayers.

Heritage destruction

Heritage destruction

Who pays for the cleanup?

Historic sites including the Fosse Way and Wessex Way, and footpaths
and bridleways used and loved by pedestrians, riders and cyclists, will be overshadowed by this industrial sprawl, risking irreparable damage to ancient landscapes and archaeological treasures.

Biodiversity loss

Heritage destruction

Biodiversity loss

Wildlife habitats will be destroyed, and shading under the panels will degrade vegetation, impacting grazing and local ecosystems.

Objections to consider

It is vital to give your feedback to IGP and let them know in your own words why you object to their proposals. Decide what messages you want to get across and leave it at that. Q1 is about national policy rather than local issues and we would suggest ignoring it.  

replaced with acres of solar panels up to 4.5 metres high, with tall mesh security fencing, security cameras, inverter cabins, substations, batteries and lighting.


that cross the proposed solar farm area, and access to rural amenities. Would you use footpaths that are narrow corridors between security fences?


The effects on your mental health of living near an ugly industrial development.


are the studies by the developer sufficient to understand the effects on wildlife,
both common and rare or protected species that experts and locals are aware of including otters, water voles, bats and birds such as owls, migratory species such as swallows and swifts? Are the mitigation measures they propose going to be adequate?


some existing hedgerows will have to be removed to get access to build the farm and cable route and this will compromise wildlife. How quickly will new hedging grow, will it be adequate to screen installations and will deciduous screening be adequate during winter months?




See Expert Report on Storm Bert under Stop Lime Down Campaign tab


The risk of permanent contamination of our water supply from: damaged panels; firefighting water if
there should be a fire in the battery storage system (BESS); herbicide application to substations.


We just have to look at other Lithium Battery fires in the news recently to see the risk. 


The solar utlity’s proximity to where you live, any conservation areas, listed buildings including
homes, churches and monuments, and how the ‘setting’ around these areas will be affected.


How it will affect the nature of the Cotswold landscape and rural villages, and the value of homes:
although adverse effects on house prices are not a planning consideration, you should still mention it!


Note: planning decisions do not consider the loss of views from private properties.


The loss of income to local businesses, possible closure of pubs and cafés due to reduced tourism.


HGV traffic during the 2-year construction period and additional traffic once operational. Having to re-
route your own trips to avoid the heavy lorries. Danger to pedestrians and cyclists. Damage to
roadside buildings.




including the extensive piledriving which will be required.


Lights and noise from the sites’ inverter cabins, battery storage and transformers.Some, if not all,
solar panels will rotate to follow the sun: this will also generate noise. Effects of glint (flashes of bright
light) and glare (continuous reflected light) from the panels.


The ‘temporary’ 60-year tenure of the solar farm: how will lands be returned to former use (to be
farmed?); the risk of renewed planning permission or new alternative industrial development on what
will now be an industrial site.


(Likely to be made in China)  their replacements over six decades and their disposal, cleaning and maintenance.


DID YOU KNOW ?

SLD Meetings

This presentation was given by Sir Mike Pitt and Professor Richard Skeffington in Feb '25

Presentation Statutory Consultation Local - Feb 2025 (pdf)

Download

Stop Lime Down Steering Committee

Who we are

Our committee includes a range of local residents with diverse skills and expertise, all of whom are volunteering their time and energy to protect the community from the long-term impacts of this development. 


The committee includes individuals with backgrounds in legal representation, environmental science, local heritage, public relations, and finance. 


All are committed to ensuring this campaign is ethical, transparent, and reflective of the views of the many local residents who oppose this development. Stop Lime Down is a non-profit organisation. 


Committee Members

Alex Frost, Sherston - Chair

Prof. Richard Skeffington, Sherston - Flooding

Sir Mike Pitt, Foxley - Planning

CEO of the Tote Group, Alex brings strategic leadership and financial expertise to the campaign.

Sir Mike Pitt, Foxley - Planning

Prof. Richard Skeffington, Sherston - Flooding

Sir Mike Pitt, Foxley - Planning

Former Chair and Chief Executive of the Planning Inspectorate, Sir Mike provides expert guidance on planning processes.

Prof. Richard Skeffington, Sherston - Flooding

Prof. Richard Skeffington, Sherston - Flooding

Prof. Richard Skeffington, Sherston - Flooding

Environmental scientist and hydrology expert with over 40 years of experience in evaluating water impacts.

Jane Clarke, Easton Grey - Legal

Craig Fuller, Norton - Landscape and Property

Prof. Richard Skeffington, Sherston - Flooding

Jane is a commercial litigation solicitor with many years experience having been a partner in City law firms for 30 years. Although not a planning specialist she is well used to working with counsel and experts and managing large disputes.

Craig Fuller, Norton - Landscape and Property

Craig Fuller, Norton - Landscape and Property

Craig Fuller, Norton - Landscape and Property

With extensive experience in property search, Craig brings insight into the impact of developments on property values. His expertise allows him to examine the potential decline in house prices caused by the solar development while advocating for local land preservation.

Alex Lloyd-Jones FCA, Norton – Finance

Craig Fuller, Norton - Landscape and Property

Craig Fuller, Norton - Landscape and Property

Alex is a Chartered Accountant and oversees campaign finances to ensure transparency and accountability.

Phil Moore, Cheltenham

Susannah Dibben, Rodbourne

Piers Dibben, Rodbourne

Phil is a semi-retired financial journalist who is liaising on behalf of Stop Lime Down with campaign groups affected by similar large-scale solar projects throughout England and Wales

Piers Dibben, Rodbourne

Susannah Dibben, Rodbourne

Piers Dibben, Rodbourne

A dedicated member with a passion for protecting the countryside, focusing on local advocacy and communications.

Susannah Dibben, Rodbourne

Susannah Dibben, Rodbourne

Susannah Dibben, Rodbourne

Susannah offers vital support in community engagement and ensuring local voices are heard.

Hugh Roche, Foxley

Anna Pitt-Stanley, Norton

Susannah Dibben, Rodbourne

Hugh runs a local company, giving him a strong understanding of the area and its needs. He leads the political and financial strategies for the campaign.

Dean Elwood, Norton

Anna Pitt-Stanley, Norton

Anna Pitt-Stanley, Norton

CEO of compliance software company, former lawyer Dean brings legal and commercial strategy to the team.

Anna Pitt-Stanley, Norton

Anna Pitt-Stanley, Norton

Anna Pitt-Stanley, Norton

Anna ensures campaign finances are managed efficiently and transparently.

January Farrington, Corston

Christine Hamilton, Hullavington

January Farrington, Corston

Specialist in public relations and communications, January helps amplify the campaign’s message.

Neil Hamilton, Hullavington

Christine Hamilton, Hullavington

January Farrington, Corston

Neil provides legal and political insights, leveraging his experience to strengthen the campaign’s strategy.

Christine Hamilton, Hullavington

Christine Hamilton, Hullavington

Christine Hamilton, Hullavington

Christine offers vital support in community engagement and ensuring local voices are heard.

Ann Hawker, Hullavington

Ann Hawker, Hullavington

Christine Hamilton, Hullavington

Long-standing community advocate with deep local knowledge and experience in grassroots organisation. She and her husband, Ashton, and son, William, farm outside of Hullavington. 

Anna-Kate Fuller, Norton

Ann Hawker, Hullavington

Anna-Kate Fuller, Norton

Committed to safeguarding the countryside, Anna-Kate plays a key role in campaign outreach and volunteer coordination.

campaign objectives

Suggest Alternative Solutions

Suggest Alternative Solutions

Suggest Alternative Solutions

Provide a dynamic voice to give another perspective: put utility-size solar industry in the right locations, not on farmland bordering villages, changing the countryside forever.

Local Voice

Suggest Alternative Solutions

Suggest Alternative Solutions

Communicate as early as possible in the process, ensuring people are informed and have a route to have their say. To empower the local community to have a say in how the future of this region is shaped. 

National Voice

Suggest Alternative Solutions

Collaboration with other national groups

Target government, media and important organisations nationally and locally in support of a ‘joined-up’ approach to putting appropriately-sized solar installations in the right locations.

Collaboration with other national groups

Collaboration with other national groups

Collaboration with other national groups

To work with the support of the UK Solar Alliance (UKSA), representing more than 120 groups fighting against inappropriate solar industry proposals across the UK and lobbying politicians and media.

Expert reports and assessments

Collaboration with other national groups

Expert reports and assessments


Specialists in landscape, hydrology, heritage, biodiversity, soils, transport, and other areas will provide detailed reports to counter the developer’s findings, giving us the robust evidence we need to make our case.

Copyright © 2025 Stop Lime Down Solar Park - All Rights Reserved.

Powered by

  • Proposal
  • SLD Campaign
  • Updates
  • Register

This website uses cookies.

We use cookies to analyze website traffic and optimize your website experience. By accepting our use of cookies, your data will be aggregated with all other user data.

DeclineAccept